Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Murtha blasts military over Haditha

The day after Memorial Day, former Marine Congressman Jack Murtha talked to NPR about Marine killings in Haditha. After an IED killed an American, U.S. Marines shot 24 unarmed Iraqis last November. Murtha says that this is a crime and that there has been a cover-up:
“They knew that the original explanation that an IED caused the casualties was not true the day afterwards. The Marine corps knew it. And you gotta remember that the chain of command in Iraq is not to the commandant of the Marine corps. The chain of command is through General Casey to General Abizay. Two months ago I told General Abizay, “General, you gotta get this out in the public. You gotta get this investigation over with.” They just told me a week ago it’d take two more months. This happened six months ago! It’s unconcionable that it would take this long to… to, uh, have an investigation. I heard a lance corporal on one of the stations this morning say he was there the next day carrying out the body of a young child that was shot through the head. So the next day they knew that it wasn’t an IED that killed him. They knew that it wasn’t an explosive device. There was no shrapnel, there was no firefight. This is what worries me. Who in the chain of command stopped the investigation? Who tried to cover this up? Because not only the Marines knew it, the Iraqis knew about it. Because they paid the victims of this thing. If it had been an explosive device by the Iraqis they wouldn’t have paid ‘em. It breaks my heart that Marines would be involved in something like this, but you can’t let it go.”
Murtha is a Vietnam vet and a big supporter of the military who crawled way out on a limb awhile back and said the troops need to be out by the end of this year. This incident will no doubt renew efforts to end the conflict there and bring troops home.

Email Murtha using this online form to thanks him for his public stand and efforts to protect our troops. Email your Congressman and demand that he or she support Murtha’s plan to Redeploy, Reallocate, and Re-engage.”

BellSouth: "We did not do it."

I've got to hand it to BellSouth: they didn't mess around with my complaining e-mails. I got no response from any of the "management team" folks, but I got replies from every person listed as a media contact, and had three messages on the phone when I got home from a staffer in their Legislative and Regulatory office (I'll call her back today). Most of their messages just repeated verbatim from the stiffly-worded statement the company released last week denying that BellSouth had any "contracts" with government agencies to "provide bulk customer calling information."

However, Jeff Battcher, BellSouth's vice-president for corporate communications, stepped away from the script and responded to my inquiry head-on. He wrote, in part:

"BellSouth has not provided the NSA or any governmental agency any customer calling information. We are not aware of the NSA having ever contacted anyone at BellSouth. We have insisted on a retraction from USA Today for their false and unsubstantiated statements. Hope this helps. There is no spin, we did not do it. We have never even been asked."

That's the kind of frankness I was hoping for: an unequivocal denial. I couldn't really ask for more from BellSouth, and I'm pleased with the response. AT&T and Verizon, like the White House, will neither confirm nor deny the allegations. Looks like the logical next step would be a thorough government investigation to verify BellSouth's claims and see what the other companies have been up to. Of course, the FCC and the Kentucky Public Services Commission are the only agencies that have not responded to any of my messages so far.

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Heroes In Wars not of Their Making

Taps Bugler

Yesterday was Memorial Day, and I actually did something to commemorate our lost servicemen and women. My daughter Chloe and I went to the Memorial Day Ceremonies here in Knoxville, sponsored by the American Legion. There was a short program that included comments from a veteran and an active duty marine, and ended with a rifle salute and taps. It was a moving experience and I’m glad I went.

It’s important to support the troops as we speak and act in opposition to the Bush administration policy in Iraq. It’s important because military personnel act under orders. They don’t get to choose whether a war is just or a strategy is wise. No matter what the situation or the consequences or the risk, our active duty military, reserves, guard, and veterans put their lives on the line.

Yesterday I also did some online reading. I read the tragic story of the fall of Saigon at the end of the Vietnam War. In the spring of 1975, American-supported South Vietnam was falling to Communist forces from the north. Panic reigned in the streets of Saigon. The city was surrounded and the only hope for escape lay with the American military. The brass in Washington had waited too long to begin the evacuation, so that soldiers were faced with thousands of Vietnamese at the airport and embassy begging to be taken along.

When the evacuation finally began, Americans and Vietnamese friendlies were to be plucked out of the chaotic and violent city by helicopter and carried to waiting ships. Master Sergeant John J. Valdez was the Staff Non Commission Officer in charge at the American Embassy, and was on the last chopper out of Vietnam. Marines secured the U.S. Embassy against surging, desperate crowds. They followed orders to let in some and keep out others. When they finally had to bar the gate and retreat inside the building, desperate crowds drove a truck through the gate and eventually overran all but the embassy roof. Valdez and his Marines maintained order in chaos, and saw to it that hundreds of personnel made it out that night on waves of helicopters.

The choppers stopped coming with only Valdez and ten of his men left on the roof in the middle of the night and shooting below. When the last few choppers finally came, Valdez and his men flew out of a city in despair. The term “hero” is usually reserved for victorious armies, and the Americans withdrew in defeat. But decades later, Valdez writes in his first-hand account,
“The men were great, and I’m not exaggerating. These kids were really good. They responded to all my commands. Considering how many young, new troops I had, they all worked as a unit. The kids were great ....I should say, the Marines were great.”
A more hopeful example of heroism and American foreign policy is the D-Day invasion of France in 1944. In another example of true heroism, 73,000 American soldiers as well as 83,115 British and Canadians followed orders to hit the beaches at D-Day. By the end of that single day of fighting, around 2500 were dead. Yet without the sacrifice of those soldiers Europe would probably have fallen to one of the most evil regimes of the twentieth century. The soldiers who hit the beach had no choice in the matter. The artillery exploded, the boats got as close as they could, the machine guns chattered, and Americans died in the surf and on the beach on the way to winning a war.

On the beaches of Normandy, soldiers charged out of waterlogged metal boxes into deadly gunfire that cut them to pieces. Many landing craft sank in rough seas. Others jumped off the boats in deep water and had to struggle out of heavy packs to keep from drowning. Once on the beach they faced cliffs in some places, razor wire in others, and wide low-tide beaches with hellish noise and smoke everywhere. Deadly accurate gun emplacements in concrete bunkers. had been preset into deadly patterns the Americans walked into. The wounded and dead were everywhere. Soldiers washed up onshore and corpses lay half-buried in the sand.

American Sergeant Leonard Lomell was part of a ranger company assigned to knock out some big guns and set up a roadblock along a coastal road. In his first-hand account, he tells how they lost a third of their men when their boat sank. Lomell was shot as soon as the gate dropped on his landing craft. Despite a flesh wound in the side, Lowell struggled acted as platoon leader. His men climbed a rope up a cliff, fought the enemy crater-to-crater, made it to the road, blew up telephone lines, evaded a large armored German force, and destroyed an artillery emplacement that arial reconnaissance had missed. For his heroism that day, Lomell received the Distinguished Service Cross.

The difference between these two stories is in the policies and strategies, not in the bravery of our soldiers. One incident signaled defeat while the other lead to victory, but individual bravery has nothing to do with victory. In fact it is discipline in the face of overwhelming risk that constitutes bravery.

As we continue to struggle with a present-day war in Iraq, let’s always remember that bad policy does not make a bad soldier. On the contrary, it is under these circumstances that true heroism shines.

Listening In

Good piece from Seymore Hersh in the New Yorker this week on the NSA spying program and the FISA law that it likely violates.

Saturday, May 27, 2006

Raising "Bell"

I am not going to write a letter to the telephone company (see Thursday's post). That's ridiculous.

Today I found a bunch of BellSouth's media relations contacts on their webpage and sent nearly every one of them an e-mail asking for a detailed accounting of how much of my customer or calling information was shared with whom and when, and suggested that I would no longer use BellSouth's services if this issue wasn't resolved to my satisfaction. In total, I e-mailed eight people, including their communications manager, the vice president for corporate communications, their director of media relations, their consumer services manager, their "reputation" manager, their "governmental affairs' spokesperson, and two people listed as Kentucky's media contacts for Bellsouth.

Then I found a webpage listing the Bellsouth management team, but no contact information was provided. However, I'm guessing the format of their e-mail addresses are the same as those of the media contacts, so I e-mailed Duane Ackerman, the chairman and CEO; Mark Feidler, the president and COO; and E.C. Roberts, Jr, Bellsouth's Kentucky president. So far none of the e-mails have bounced back, so hopefully they will all have a little message waiting for them when they return from their Memorial Day holiday. I'll keep you all posted as to any responses I get.

I did find the actual press release Bellsouth issued denying that there was any "contract" with the NSA and that no "bulk customer information" had been provided. I'm not interested in contracts or "bulk" information. I just want to know what happened to my information. I've e-mailed Jeff Brattcher, whose name is on the press release to find out more. According to the USA Today, when questioned as to whether any contracts exist between Bellsouth and the Defense Department, which oversees the NSA, Mr. Brattcher did not know the answer.

Thursday, May 25, 2006

BellSouth is not answering the phone

Today I called BellSouth customer service to ask for details about how much of my own calling information had been shared with the government. A pleasant fellow named Mr. Richardson answered my call, and politely explained that "At the present time there is no documentation that we can share with the public." I then asked who I could talk to to get more information. He typed furiously into his computer and said that the only thing he could do is refer me to the public statement BellSouth issued recently in which they denied having any "contract" with the government to povide customer calling information.

I pointed out that this statement just stated that there was no contractual agreement to share information, not that no information had been shared. Again, Mr. Richardson referred me to the statement. I asked to speak with someone in the media department who was responsible for the statement. He said he did not have that information, but gave me an address where I could write a request: 500 Chastain Blvd NW, Ste 505, Kennesaw, GA 30144. "I thought this was as customer service line," I said. "It is, sir, but I can only give you information about your account here."

"This is about my account," I said, and went on to say that I have been considering dropping BellSouth in favor of internet phone, and that if I couldn't be sure BellSouth was going to protect my privacy I had no incentive to stay with the company. "I understand, sir," Mr. Richardson said.

I did look at the BellSouth website to see if there was any other contact information, but all they give you is the customer service line. Funny, how you can't get any service there when it comes to your privacy.

Wednesday, May 24, 2006

Lobby the FCC, KPSC, KTA...everybody!

Yesterday the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, the regulatory agency charged with enforcing the nation's communication laws, said the FCC would not be investigating the allegations that the nation's biggest phone companies turned over records of their customers to the National Security Agency without warrants. The chairman claimed that such an investigation might reveal national secrets. Again, how convenient!

You can sign a petition to demand that the FCC take some action on this matter here.

For Kentucky residents, contact the Kentucky Public Service Commission, the chief regulatory agency for the Commonweath's telephone companies. Demand that they launch an immediate investigation of the phone companies' activities here Kentucky and that they issue an immediate cease-and-desist order regarding all such releases of customer information until the matter is resolved. E-mail them at psc.consumer.inquiries@ky.gov or call them at 1-800-772-4636.

You can also e-mail Forest Skaggs III, Executive Director of the Kentucky Telephone Assocation, the main telecom trade group in the state, to demand that his organization investigate and take some action. His e-mail address is forest@kta.org.

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

I want my inalienable rights back!

I'm fed up. I know, I know...you've heard me rant and rave about politics before, but things have really, really gotten out of hand. First there was the Orwellian-named "Patriot Act," which allowed the government unprecedented powers to spy on average Americans, including your library records, without any judicial oversite. Then it was revealed that the FBI was keeping tabs on peaceful political groups who opposed the war in Iraq and the government's abridgement of civil liberties. Then the bombshell that the National Security Agency was listening to phone calls without getting a warrant from the super-secret courts established under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1976 (which allows investigators to get warrants after the fact in emergency situations). Now, we have learned that in cooperation with the phone companies, the government has been tracking the phone calls of nearly every American. Efforts to investigate all these issues have been squashed in the name of "national security." How convenient.

What disheartens me the most is that so many Americans have decided that all of this okay because we have to catch terrorists. As one loud senator put it, "You can't have civil liberties if you're dead." That's a great soundbite, but it's terribly misguided because his comment suggests that we are forced to decide between our civil liberties and our security. We don't. I don't mind the government using all the available technology to track and investigate people whom they have a legitimate reason to believe may be terrorists. The law gives us a mechanism for doing this through the secret FISA courts. But our current leaders have ignored this law, and in effect, ignored the basic philosophy of the Constitution. "I don't care if they watch me," you might say, "I have nothing to hide." Alright, neither do I. That's not the point: the point is that there's nobody to keep any tabs, checks or limits on what these government agencies are doing. And that's un-American.

Our nation's founders believed that government power concentrated in the hands of a few is dangerous. That's why they created the system of checks and balances that distributes power into three different branches of government. The founders didn't have a problem with the government protecting people's security, but they believed that the judicial branch ought to have some oversight of the process. While the executive branch is protecting our security, the judicial branch is supposed to be protecting our freedom. The executive branch has now decided they can ignore all that.

Americans of all political persuasions ought to be outraged. We don't have to surrender our liberties in the name of security. The FBI and NSA and White House just need to follow the law as it is written: go to the secret courts, get warrants, and spy away. Whether you are liberal, conservative or libertarian, that ought to be common sense, common ground suggestion.

I'm fighting back. I don't necessarily expect to win, and you may think I'm paranoid, but I fully expect to be the target of more government surveillance for doing so. But somebody has to defend these basic American ideas. I've started by signing this petition to the phone companies demanding that they stop cooperating with warrantless government spying. encourage you to sign the petition also. I plan to follow up with a phone call directly to BellSouth. I'll keep you posted. I also encourage you to call your congressional representatives to demand a full investigation of the FBI/CIA/NSA/White House spying program. You can get more information here. I also plan to start a local chapter of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, which lobbies local governments for resolutions that call for local support of civil liberties. I'm going to document my battles on this blog.

This feels like a meager, tiny little stab at a vast, secret, pervasive government power structure, but it's the best I can do for now. I hope you'll consider joining me in this struggle.

Monday, May 22, 2006

Support the Orange Card Amendment

This is a last-minute appeal for you to support important immigration legislation being considered as you read this by the U.S. Senate. As you know, the House passed immigration legislation that would build a hugely expensive and probably ineffective border fence. It would also criminalize church groups who give any aid including food and medicine to undocumented immigrants.

Our own Tennessee Immigration and Refugee Rights Coalition (TIRRC) will be meeting with legislators this week to seek their support. Watch for news stories about this. Reply by email if your church or civic group would like to join Knoxville’s Church of the Savior and others in supporting a humane immigration policy.

Senator Feinstein has introduced the Orange Card amendment that would allow all current illegals a path to citizenship, and prevent families from being separated and otherwise law-abiding immigrants from being deported. The Hegel-Martinez bill now before the Senate is not workable because it would require 4.8 million of the foreign workers in the country to return home before applying for citizenship. I urge you to support the Feinstein Orange Card amendment.

You can help support humane immigration reform by calling your senators today and using the following script:

“Hello my name is (Your NAME) and I am calling from (Your CITY & STATE). I support Senator Feinstein’s Orange Card amendment and strongly urge you vote in favor of a simple and single process that will allow all 12 million undocumented immigrants to legalize their status. This amendment will give undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship, keep families together and protect immigrants’ rights to due process. Thank you.”


Here are the numbers for Tennessee. Please call NOW and politely urge support for same immigration reform. Our country is a nation of immigrants. Let’s not become a nation of xenophobes.

Senator Frist
D.C. Office (202) 224–3344
Nashville (615) 352–9411

Senator Alexander
D.C. Office (202) 224–4944
Nashville (615) 736–5129