Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Now What?

Just a quick little post-election post: I am, of course, happy with the overall outcome yesterday. Like I said a few days ago, I don't expect some new dawning of liberty across the land. But I will definitely sleep easier knowing that there is at least one branch of government organized to place a check on executive power for the next two years.

Perhaps Rumsfeld's resignation is more satisfying than even the election...nah, not THAT satisfying, but pretty good nonetheless. That he stayed this long is a sign of the President's incredible arrogance.

The Democrats have to get moving and fast. They need to make some real legislative decisions so that when two years has passed they are still not running on a theme of, "Vote for us 'cause we didn't make this mess." Listening to John Murtha blather on rather incoherently on NPR this morning about the Dems' vague proposals for Iraq didn't inspire much confidence. I'm not smart enough (or maybe I'm just too bleary-eyed from staying up late last night) to say exactly what the Democratic agenda should be, but this should be the first order of business if there's any hope to make this win meaningful. Perhaps a good start would be reviving the Jeffersonian ideals of the party as a legislative philosophy?

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

How many people think CHeney will go soon... an attractive '08 candidate will be put in as VP before christmas?
ericmcnew

10:03 AM, November 09, 2006  
Blogger Cosmic Hobo said...

Wow. Interesting thought. That would be really smart on the part of the Repubs. Who would it be? McCain's the front-runner now, and it would have to be somebody who could counter McCain's name recognition. Do you think they'll abandon Rove's strategy of appealing to the lunatic fringe now that they finally lost some votes?

10:17 PM, November 11, 2006  
Blogger Todd Duren said...

Dunno if W will fire Cheney, but he should. b>According to Woodward's '04 book Plan of Attack, Cheney and Rumsfeld were the driving force behind invading Iraq soon after 9/11, and used Tennet's "slam dunk" assertion of WMDs to pursuade W to go to war despite his initial misgivings over intelligence. Of course W still believes we need to "stay the course" although he uses other language and now denies that was ever his atttitude. My prediction: we will boost troop levels and a Democrat will be in the White House in '08.

11:07 AM, December 16, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home